Clash of Civilization, Iran Part II
By Jamal Kanj
Jan. 14, 2012
Israel’s survival kit is: perpetuate conflict, insecurity to rationalize collective hate and finally playing victim.
Devoid of conflict, Israel implodes internally; without hate, Zionism
losses its justification; and playing eternal victim to continue
blackmailing the West. Absence of this holy trinity, Israel ceases to
exist.
From its inception, the house of Zion has mastered exploiting
adversarial powers to advance Israel’s cause. For instance, their
influence over the Democratic Party in the US began with President
Truman’s bid for 2nd term election in 1948.
Responding to strong opposition from Secretary of State General
George Marshall and Department experts urging against recognition of
Israel, President replied: “I’m sorry gentlemen but I have to answer
to hundreds of thousands [Jewish voters] who are anxious for the
success of Zionism. I do not have hundreds of thousands of [voting]
Arabs among my constituents”
Zionists influence over liberal American politics was matched with
doctrinal school of Conservative theoreticians aligning the Republican
Party’s platform with Israel’s objectives. The Neoconservative Zionists,
coined Zioncons, invented the “Clash of Civilization” concept to fight
Israel’s wars.
Part I, was manifested by fabricating Weapon of Mass Destruction
entrap dragging the US to do Israel’s job in Iraq. Henceforth, making US
power subservient to Israel’s interest and driving a wedge between the
West and a “feigned” Muslim world.
Notwithstanding, examining closely the contrived Clash of
Civilization idiom exposes serious flaws in the Zioncon’s postulation.
For the term Civilization denotes well defined camp with unique
collective cultural identity. While the West is comparatively uniform,
the ostensibly opposing Muslim side is comprised of multifarious
diametrically opposed entities.
In fact, it was this very adversarial state and help from Muslim
nations that facilitated US war against members of the same purported
“Civilization.” Whereby, Iran abetted, arguably indirectly, the American
incursion in Afghanistan and Iraq, while Pakistan played vital role in
the US war against Taliban.
With the Zioncon’s success in instigating US invasion in Iraq, the
liberal wing of the house of Zion is reassembling its resources pursuing
new conflict, now with Iran for Clash of Civilization part II.
Perfecting the “victim and insecurity” role, the only acknowledged
nuclear power in the region, Israel is dogged to waging war against
Iran, a potential nuclear power. Appeasing Israel and to avert its
threat of war, the US and the European Union have imposed drastic
economic and financial measures to impede the development of Iran’s
nuclear program.
Even absent of an Israeli attack, the West’s progressive sanctions
could eventually foment a regional war. Deflecting domestic pressure,
Iranian leaders might make imprudent moves by projecting outwards their
internal economic difficulties ensuing in military conflict with the
West.
Likewise, in a tough election year, the US administration is disposed
more than ever to Zionist blackmail. From following Republican
primaries debates, confrontation with Iran seems to be taking a front
seat in the American election. Responding to electoral politics, the US
is posed also to taking uncalculated steps triggering an open military
conflict.
A new conflict with Iran will lapse the world’s economy into
recession. The US economy cannot afford another war or unpredictable oil
prices. Regional economies will retract with the deterioration of
industrialized world economies. Israel as in Iraq invasion will come out
as the only winner.
Meanwhile, Israel and its Sayanims (Zionist helpers in foreign
countries, conservatives and liberals) will start inaugurating a new
image for their next perpetual war: Clash of Civilization part III. |